新利体育 18luck|新利18体育网

Skip to content Skip to search Skip to footer Gender Equity and Title IX Compliance at WashU Open Menu Back Close Menu Search for: Search Close Search Where to Seek Help For StudentsFor Students Student Title IX Grievance Process Student Gender Equity Grievance Process Who Can I Talk To? University Office Roles in Title IX Your Rights Confidentiality Requests For Respondents (Accused) About Title IXAbout Title IX Office Staff Definitions of Key Terms in the Title IX &＃038; Gender Equity Processes Mandatory Reporters Consent and Incapacitation University Sexual Harassment Investigation Board (USHIB) Climate Surveys For Faculty &＃038; StaffFor Faculty &＃038; Staff Faculty Title IX Grievance Process Staff Title IX Grievance Process Who Can I Talk To? For Faculty Respondents (Accused) For Staff Respondents (Accused) For Mandatory Reporters Pregnancy RelatedPregnancy Related Pregnancy/Pregnancy Related for Faculty and Staff Pregnancy/Pregnancy Related for Students EventsEvents Past Events Listening Sessions Open Search Definitions of Key Terms in the Title IX &＃038; Gender Equity Processes Complainant | Respondent | Mandatory Reporter | USHIB | Witnesses | Complaint | Preponderance of Evidence  | Sanctions | Consent | Coercion | Dating Violence | Domestic Violence | Incapacitation |  Stalking Definitions of Key Parties Complainant: The Complainant is any individual (whether a WashU student, faculty, staff or an individual outside of our WashU community) who reports behavior that may constitute a violation of the University Student Conduct Code (USCC) and initiates a complaint. Respondent: The Respondent is an individual reported in a Complaint to have violated the USCC. Mandatory Reporter:  At WashU, all faculty and most staff members are required to report incidents (or allegations) of sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, stalking or other forms of misconduct that violate university policy to their supervisor, the Title IX Coordinator, the Associate Title IX Coordinator, or the Gender Equity and Title IX Compliance Office. Mandatory reporters include: 1) any University employee who becomes aware of such incidents by or against a person they supervise; 2) any faculty member who becomes aware of such incidents against a student; and 3) any department head, director, or other similar administrator who becomes aware of such incidents. All employees with supervisory authority, including graduate students with teaching responsibilities and employees who have significant responsibility for students and campus activities, are mandatory reporters. For more information, please review the university’s Discrimination and Harassment Policy. Even if a mandatory reporter believes an incident has already been reported, they are expected to share it with GETIXCO or their supervisor, who in turn is expected to share it with GETIXCO. These individuals include, but are not limited to: all WashU faculty members, WashU Residential Life employees, WashU athletic coaches and trainers, WashU academic deans, WashU academic advisors and WashU Assistants in Course Instruction. USHIB: The University Sexual Harassment Investigation Board (USHIB) is comprised of faculty, staff, and students appointed by the Chancellor who are trained to investigate Complaints involving reports of sexual assault and some reports of sexual harassment, domestic/dating violence and stalking. The USHIB investigates and decides the outcome of Complaints referred to it by the university’s Title IX Coordinator. Witnesses: Witnesses are individuals who may have seen the alleged conduct or have other information related to an investigation. The Complainant and Respondent are encouraged to provide the Investigator with names of potential witnesses who could provide additional information to the investigation. Procedural Terms Complaint: The submission of information to the Gender Equity and Title IX Compliance Office reporting a violation of the USCC involving sexual harassment, sexual violence, domestic violence, dating violence or stalking. Complaints can be filed by students, faculty, staff or third parties. Preponderance of Evidence: In order for the Respondent to be found responsible for violating the USCC or other WashU policies, the evidence must show that it is more likely than not that the Respondent committed the reported violations. The concept of “preponderance of the evidence” can be visualized as a scale, with the totality of evidence presented by each side resting on the respective trays on either side of the scale. If the scale tips ever so slightly to one side or the other, the heavier side will prevail. If the scale does not tip toward either side the Respondent will prevail. Sanctions: Consequences imposed after a finding of responsibility through the USHIB process or the USCC process. A list of possible sanctions can be found in Section VI of the USCC. Additional Definitions    Consent: Consent consists of mutually understandable words and/or actions that indicate an individual has freely chosen to engage in sexual activity. In the absence of such words and/or actions, consent does not exist. Consent may not be inferred from silence, passivity, lack of physical resistance, or lack of verbal refusal alone. Consent to engage in sexual activity must be knowing and voluntary. For example, when any participant is physically forced, passed out, asleep, unconscious or beaten, sexual activity is not knowing and voluntary and, therefore, not consensual. Sexual activity that is coerced is also not knowing and voluntary and, therefore, not consensual. Consent to engage in sexual activity must exist from the beginning to the end of each instance of sexual activity, and for each form of sexual contact. Consent may be withdrawn by either party, at any time. An individual who is incapacitated is unable to give consent. In such circumstances, the Respondent will be held responsible if the Respondent either knew or a reasonable person in the same position would have known that the other party was incapacitated and therefore could not consent to the sexual activity. Coercion: Any words or conduct that eliminate the other person’s ability to choose whether or not to engage in sexual activity is considered coercion. Examples of coercion could include the following (so long as the conduct rises to a level that eliminates the other person’s ability to choose whether to engage in sexual activity): threats, whether expressed or implied, of substantial emotional or psychological harm or any physical harm, confinement, or other similar conduct. Dating Violence: Violence committed by a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim. The existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on the reporting party’s statement and with consideration of the length of the relationship, the type of relationship, and the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship. For the purposes of this definition: Dating violence includes, but is not limited to, sexual or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse. Dating violence does not include acts covered under the definition of domestic violence. Domestic violence includes felony or misdemeanor crimes committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim under the family or domestic violence laws of the jurisdiction receiving grant funding and, in the case of victim services, includes the use or attempted use of physical abuse or sexual abuse, or a pattern of any other coercive behavior committed, enabled, or solicited to gain or maintain power and control over a victim, including verbal, psychological, economic, or technological abuse that may or may not constitute criminal behavior, by a person who is a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim, or person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim; is cohabitating, or has cohabitated, with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner; shares a child in common with the victim; or commits acts against a youth or adult victim who is protected from those acts under the family or domestic violence laws of the jurisdiction. Incapacitation: Incapacitation is the inability – whether temporarily or permanently – to give consent because the individual is mentally and/or physically helpless due to a medical condition or the voluntary or involuntary consumption of drugs and/or alcohol, or because the individual is unconscious, asleep or otherwise unaware that the sexual activity is occurring. Stalking: Engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to: Fear for the person’s safety or the safety of others; or Suffer substantial emotional distress. For the purposes of this definition: ‘Course of conduct’ means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes with a person’s property. ‘Reasonable person’ means a reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the victim. ‘Substantial emotional distress’ means significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling. About Title IX Office Staff Definitions of Key Terms in the Title IX &＃038; Gender Equity Processes Mandatory Reporters Consent and Incapacitation University Sexual Harassment Investigation Board (USHIB) Climate Surveys Gender Equity and Title IX Compliance OfficeUmrath Hall [email protected] Instagram Need Help? For immediate medical care, or if you are in danger: 314-935-5555 (Danforth Campus) 314-362-HELP (4357) (Med Campus) 911 (Off Campus) [email protected] ©2024 Washington University in St. Louis