新澳门澳利澳6肖18码209|新利luck18官网客户端

Skip to content Skip to search Skip to footer Office of the Provost Open Menu Back Close Menu Search for: Search Close Search AboutAbout Provost Wendland People Reporting Units Contact Us Vice ProvostsVice Provosts Vice Provost for Educational InitiativesVice Provost for Educational Initiatives Academic IntegrityAcademic Integrity Process For Students For Faculty and Staff For the Academic Integrity Board Contact Us Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs and DiversityVice Provost for Faculty Affairs and Diversity Mentoring at WashU Vice Provost for Graduate Education and International AffairsVice Provost for Graduate Education and International Affairs Graduate Student Experience and ResourcesGraduate Student Experience and Resources Career DevelopmentCareer Development The Pivot 314 Program PhD Education and GovernancePhD Education and Governance Doctoral CouncilDoctoral Council Doctoral Council Members Doctoral Council: Student Representatives Fellowships, Funding, and SupportFellowships, Funding, and Support The Ann W. and Spencer T. Olin – Chancellor’s Fellowship 2024 She Leads Symposium @WashU Chancellor’s Graduate Fellowship Program The Spencer T. and Ann W. Olin Fellowship Program for Women in Graduate Study University Awards External Funding She Leads Symposium 2022 Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Initiatives Faculty ResourcesFaculty Resources Faculty Information Handbook Policies Reports Gender Equity and Title IX Compliance Office Adjunct Faculty Union Other Resources Programs &＃038; InitiativesPrograms &＃038; Initiatives Beyond BoundariesBeyond Boundaries Beyond Boundaries Courses Cluster Hire Focused on Race and Ethnicity Scholarship (2020-23) Danforth Task Force on Climate and Culture  Faculty Achievements Faculty DiversityFaculty Diversity Race and Ethnicity Cluster Hire Initiative Spring 2022 Faculty Service Equity Task Force Student Sunrise Project Committees Institutional DataInstitutional Data Faculty Work Life Survey Student Surveys Office of Data Governance Major Survey Overview Institutional Research &＃038; Analysis Team Accreditation &＃038; AssessmentAccreditation &＃038; Assessment Higher Learning Commission 10-Year Comprehensive Evaluation Professional and specialized accreditation NC-SARA Membership Licensure Disclosure Information HLC Changes to Existing Academic Programs Form University Assessment Committee Assessment 101 Tips Open Search Academic Integrity About Academic Integrity in the Office of the Provost at Washington University in St. Louis aims to create a consistent, clear, effective, and timely process to address academic integrity violations, to bolster trust in the process, to provide structured takeaways for students, and to increase overall support.  The Academic Integrity Coordinators are dedicated to encouraging responsible community behavior, educating students, and facilitating accountability in situations where violations of the University Student Conduct Code have occurred. These standards and intervention efforts contribute to a positive university climate that encourages students to take responsibility for their actions, learn conflict resolution skills, enhance decision-making ability, and advance the development of social awareness and ethical values. The success and effectiveness of the academic integrity process will rely on a community committed to upholding a culture of honesty, responsibility, and integrity.  Our community must prioritize this commitment by incorporating the precept of academic integrity into our daily interactions including course lessons, group meetings, and beyond. “Academic integrity is a commitment, even in the face of adversity, to six fundamental values: honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage. From these values flow principles of behavior that enable academic communities to translate ideals into action” (International Center for Academic Integrity, 2024). Information regarding campus policies including the academic integrity policy can be found below: University Student Conduct Code Academic Integrity Policy Values Equity Definition: When we are equitable, we recognize the value inherent in others’ perspectives and experiences while ensuring that everyone is held to the same standards of ethical behavior that undergird participation within a shared intellectual community. This recognition allows us to grow intellectually, communicate responsibly, and cultivate awareness of the limitations in our own understanding, thereby contributing earnestly to intellectual discourse.  Rationale: Equity grants every member of our learning community access to an even playing field such that an individual’s achievements reflect an honest/bona fide commitment to meeting the learning objectives of any academic undertaking.     Application: To maintain equitable access to intellectual knowledge, we do not contribute to, distribute, and/or otherwise consult shared repositories of course materials that are not universally accessible, whether shared among individuals or in affiliation with ​​student-run groups.  To maintain equitable access to intellectual knowledge, we do not seek, use, or consult services to write or otherwise complete our work, and we do not assist another person in such activity.    To avoid collaborations that are not explicitly authorized, we seek to understand the parameters and practice of collaboration, whether for assigned or unassigned group study, projects, or presentations because such unwarranted collaborations undermine our pursuit of an equitable learning process.   To recognize the individuals in our community, we acknowledge all parties who contribute to the process of intellectual knowledge on the final presentation and/or submission of a paper, project, exam, or other form of publication and/or assessment; that is, if the work we generate results from or is the product of the efforts of two or more individuals, we acknowledge those contributors.   Respect Definition: Respect is engendered by empathy and prompts us to extend due consideration for beliefs that may not coincide with our own. With empathy, we are able to make a steadfast commitment to the learning process, with all its inherent challenges and rewards, and inspire confidence that the objectives of intellectual discourse have been met.   Rationale :  A robust scholarly community invites dynamic debate that reflects a diverse range of perspectives and encourages the discovery, sharing, and development of knowledge.   Intellectual contributions are the product of individual and collective contributions over time; they do not exist in a vacuum but are rooted in personal and scholarly contexts. Failure to signal the origins of those contributions erodes the trust that others place in the legitimacy of our knowledge-seeking endeavors.     Application:    To apply ideas to new contexts, we strive to provide a comprehensive and honest accounting for how those ideas came into being.   To acknowledge those connections explicitly, we use appropriate citation practices to cite through quotation, paraphrase, summary, or other means of representation, the words, phrases, and ideas of someone else.   To hold the intellectual contributions of ​​each individual in high regard, we engage in respectful dialogue with others and do not act self-righteously, minimize dissonant perspectives, or leap to judgments.     Authenticity Definition: Authenticity requires our actions to align with the value we, as a community of scholars, place on independent thinking. As independent thinkers, we strive to be confident in our own abilities even if this means sitting with ambiguity.     Rationale:  Authentic actions require us to step outside our academic comfort zone and look beyond certainty. When we take intellectual risks, we are more likely to innovate freely, reach our full potential, and find our own unique academic voice.      Application:    To share our discoveries, evidence, and arguments, we present, in addition to our findings, the process by which we made those discoveries, found the evidence, and developed those arguments.   To recognize, exercise, and maintain our authenticity, we take responsibility for and ownership of our discoveries and actions, with the goals of ensuring equity and prioritizing respect for those whose intellectual knowledge helps us to build our own knowledge.  Goals Increase Trust Members of the University community1 will be confident that the University’s academic integrity processes and policies reflect institutional values of equity, educational excellence, and care for community members. Policies and procedures will be considered clear, fair, and judicious.  Enhance Educational Impact Members of the University community will create and practice a system that balances educational and disciplinary measures. Students’ interaction with the academic integrity process will lead to a recognition of the seriousness of any violation, and to a lessened likelihood of future violations.  Increase Support for those Involved in the Academic Integrity Process Taking into account historical outcomes, members of the University community will design a support plan that helps faculty, students, and staff navigate the academic integrity process in order (1) to minimize the perceived burden of preparing for hearings, (2) to allow for continued engagement with their other educational responsibilities, and (3) to minimize variations among individual experiences.  Create a Consistent, Clear, Effective, and Timely Process to Address alleged Academic Integrity Violations Members of the University community will design an academic integrity infrastructure that streamlines the process, clarifies the procedure, and facilitates consistent and timely decisions.   Vice Provost for Educational Initiatives Report a Concern About Course Policy The Politics of Reproduction Enrollment in Courses with Overlapping Meeting Times Academic Integrity Process For Students For Faculty and Staff For the Academic Integrity Board Contact Us Addressing Artificial Intelligence in 2023 Office of the Provost229 N. Brookings HallMSC 1072-0105-02St. Louis, MO [email protected] Us Office Directory People Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs and Diversity Vice Provost for Graduate Education and International Affairs Faculty information handbook The handbook features a list of organizations, rules and statements important to faculty and academic administrators. Schools Arts & Sciences Brown School McKelvey School of Engineering Olin Business School Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts School of Continuing & Professional Studies (CAPS) School of Law School of Medicine     ©2024 Washington University in St. Louis